The Gould Cooksey Fennell Blog

Proposed Regulations Dismiss Clawback Concern As To Large Gifts Made From 2018 Through 2025

Proposed Regulations Dismiss Clawback Concern As To Large Gifts Made From 2018 Through 2025

US Treasury Building, Washington DC

In recent years, our federal transfer tax laws have provided us with very significant jumps in the exemption levels for gift tax and estate tax purposes, but coupled with an expiration date โ€“ a so called โ€œsunsetโ€ โ€“ that prompts a reversion back to much lower exemption amounts. These โ€œuse it or lose itโ€ prospects have motivated many wealthy individuals to consider accelerating large wealth transfers to lower generations to take advantage of the elevated exemption levels before they vanish. However, there has remained a concern that the tax avoidance benefits obtained by making current use of the elevated exemption levels could be undone, ultimately, by the resulting tax treatment of future gifts and death-time bequests that occur after the sunset has brought back a much lower exemption environment. This concern became known as the โ€œclawbackโ€ possibility.

In response to these concerns, Treasury and the IRS issued new proposed regulations in November under Reg. ยง20.2010-1. These new regulations are regarded as โ€œanti-clawbackโ€ rules, as they endeavor to confirm that use of the available elevated exemptions, while they remain in place, will not later result in a full or partial recoupment, or clawback, of the corresponding tax savings, even if the future brings much lower exemption levels that become applicable to that same donorโ€™s later gifts or estate.

The issuance of these new regulations is a welcome event. While the clawback possibility was generally regarded as unlikely, the prospect of that result was a hindrance to effective wealth transfer planning. The affirmative rejection of the clawback approach, as set forth in the new regulations and their preamble, now provides us with the comfort of certainty.

Before the proposed regulations become final, the IRS and Treasury Department will consider public comments submitted by February 21, 2019. Public hearing will be held on March 13, 2019. Thereafter, the agencies will determine whether to finalize the rule and establish its effective date. It is widely expected that there will be no reversal or major change in the substance of the existing proposed regulations as they move toward finalization.

About The Author

Share Now:

REQUEST A CONSULATION

Name(Required)

NOTABLE SETTLEMENTS AND VERDICTS

A 52 year old man arrived at a hospital ER with a UTI, resulting in negligent, non-emergency intubation that caused the catastrophic anoxic brain injury leading to his death. After a trial involving complex medical and technical issues relating to critical care medicine, infectious disease, hospital administration, and electronic medical record systems, the family obtained a wrongful death settlement of $31.9 million.

Trial arising from failure to diagnosis colon perforation after a laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery causing permanent injury to the Plaintiff. After a three week trial a Martin County jury rejected the Defendantsโ€™ position finding the hospital 70% responsible for Mrs. Mooreโ€™s damages and the physician 30% responsible. The award included just over $600,000 for past medical expenses, $370,000 in future medical care, and non-economic damages of almost $2 million.

A Brevard County Jury awarded Plaintiff $6.4M against Defendant State Farm, following an accident that resulted in numerous catastrophic orthopedic injuries, including a below knee amputation of the Plaintiffโ€™s left leg.

Pedestrian was struck and killed crossing the street in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Plaintiff was driving his tractor trailer on a single lane highway when hit head on by the defendant negligently operating his semi-truck. As a direct result the plaintiff suffered bodily injury and continuing pain and suffering. Circuit court 19 awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $2,899,898.60.

Indian River County crash resulting in significant injuries to a husband and wife. This matter was resolved prior to filing a lawsuit.

Toggle Gould Cooksey Fennell served as Co-Counsel in a Georgia case involving allegedย misdiagnosis/mistreatmentย of preeclampsia resulting in the death of a 39 year old mother.

REQUEST A CALL

* Our attorneys and staff value your privacy and will not share your personal information with any third-party entities.